Category: Bookish Question

Does it confuse you when authors use the same name to write in different genres?

Bookish Question #264 | Does it confuse you when authors use the same name to write in different genres?

As a young reader, I didn’t necessarily follow particular authors.

I’d pick up a book and read it (or not) based on the cover illustration and the description on the back cover. My mother once told me that as I got older, I’d start looking for books on the basis of their author, and she was right.

This was especially the case once I started reading Christian fiction.

I discovered favourite authors, and a lot of my early favourite authors also fell in the same genre, so I would read by genre. A lot of my early Christian fiction favourites were historical fiction or historical romance.

I then moved into romantic suspense, starting with Dee Henderson’s O’Malley series, then moving into Kristen Heitzmann, Susan May Warren, and Irene Hannon.

While I discovered Susan May Warren through her romantic suspense, I soon moved into her contemporary romances. The change in genre didn’t confuse me because it was subtle: her romantic suspense novels were an equal mix of romance and suspense, while her romance novels were heavier on the romance but still had a slight suspense thread.

But I did get confused with some of Irene Hannon’s novels, because the change was a lot more dramatic. At one point, she was writing romantic suspense (which I loved), and women’s fiction with a touch of romance (or perhaps they were romance with a heavy women’s fiction). Either way, I did get confused, and it took me a good while to start reading the women’s fiction.

What about you? Does it confuse you when authors use the same name to write in different genres?

Do you finish reading a book that doesn't fit your genre expectations?

Bookish Question #263 | Do you finish reading a book that doesn’t fit your genre expectations?

Do I finish reading a book that doesn’t meet genre expectations?

As with so many of these questions … it depends.

I often buy books based on their genre and description, but they then get downloaded to my Kindle … and they sit there. As a result, I may not always remember what genre a book is supposed to be when I start reading.

Some books make the genre clear from the title: A Match Made at Christmas is likely to be a romance, while Fatal Illusions is likely to be a thriller or suspense novel. Others are less obvious: Going South or Bridges could be anything from lighthearted fiction (romance or rom-com) to serious nonfiction (travel and architecture, perhaps). It doesn’t matter.

If I’m enjoying the book, I’ll keep reading.

But I will occasionally not finish reading a book because it doesn’t meet genre expectations. For example, if a book is supposed to be a romance and I’m halfway through before boy meets girl … well, I probably won’t get that far.

What if the romance doesn’t have a happy ever after ending? I’ll finish the book (how else do I find out about the off-genre ending?), but I’ll be wary about buying or reading anything else from that author.

I mostly buy Christian fiction, so do expect the books on my Kindle to be either Christian or “sweet and wholesome”.

I may therefore give up on a book that has bad language, drunkenness, excessive violence, or sexual situations if I bought it expecting it to be Christian or sweet.

But that doesn’t mean I’ll abandon every book at the first bad word. I recently read Wanderers by Chuck Wendig. It’s a brilliant book, but does have a lot of colourful language. However, I’ve read Chuck’s blog so the language didn’t surprise me. If I saw the same language in a Christian novel, I would be unlikely to keep reading because that’s not what I expect in Christian fiction.

What about you? Do you finish reading a book that doesn’t fit your genre expectations?

Bookish Question #262 | What is wrong with book marketing (from a reader perspective)?

My degree is marketing, and while I’ve never worked in marketing in a professional capacity, it’s a subject I’ve always had a keen interest in.

My first comment about book marketing is that authors defined “marketing” too narrowly.

Marketing is about more than advertising and promotion.

Marketing starts with the product: having a good book (so that’s about plot, characters, genre, writing, and editing). It’s about packaging that book in a format readers want (paperback, eBook, audio), and selling the book somewhere readers can find it (place) at a price they are willing to pay.

Once an author has got the  basics right, they can start thinking about book marketing in the sense of advertising.

Even that has two aspects: promotion (actively advertising your book to new readers) and platform (passive marketing via a website or other online locations that are ‘set and forget’).

I see several groups of authors who get marketing wrong.

One group takes the scattergun approach:

Mention spam their book online all day, every day, posting in as many Facebook groups as possible and filling their Twitter feed with self-promotion. While this  approach might have worked in the early days of social media, there are issues with this approach:

  • If the Twitter (or other social media algorithm) sees posts that aren’t getting any engagement, they will stop showing those posts to followers. No views = no readers.
  • The Facebook groups that permit this kind of “hit-and-run” promotion have nothing but promotion, so there are no readers left in those groups. No readers = no sales.
  • Many social media networks no longer show posts that are obviously self-promotion. Instead, they show paid advertisements. Why would they show free promotion when they can show paid promotion?
Another group subscribes to the “Field of Dreams” marketing mantra:

If you build it, they will come. No, they won’t. You can build the best mousetrap (write the best book) in the world, but if you don’t tell people about it, they can’t buy it. (And if they don’t need a mousetrap, they won’t buy it even if you do ell them about it). I see a lot of authors writing and publishing in genres that don’t get a lot of reader interest (e.g. poetry and memoir).

The final group subscribes to all the marketing theories …

Although they often forget the one that says “start with a great book”. A “great book” is subjective, but there are a lot of signs of a not-great book (bad cover design, spelling errors in the advertising copy, bad editing etc).

They have a website, they get on social media, they start a newsletter. They write lots of social media posts and send lots of long newsletters and and and …

And it’s all too much.

It makes me tired. Perhaps it’s because this is the end of a long year (long three years?). Perhaps it’s that I don’t have the attention span. Perhaps it’s because I don’t have the capacity to take everything in, but it’s too much.

Of course, what’s too much for me isn’t too much for someone else (and might not be enough for some people).

One newsletter a month might not be enough … but three in a week is too much.

So that’s what I find many authors get wrong with book marketing (from a reader perspective): sometimes it’s focusing on the wrong thing (advertising) and sometimes it’s just too much.

What about you? As a reader, what do you think authors get wrong with book marketing?

Bookish Question #261 | Do you get frustrated when you read a book that’s marketed wrong?

Do I get frustrated when you read a book that’s marketed wrong?

Yes.

But first let me give you an example to explain what I mean by a book that’s marketed wrong.

Several years ago, I bought a book with a bright pink illustrated cover that featured a picture of the Eiffel Tower. I expected the book to be a romance, or perhaps a rom-com.

Why?

Pink is the colour of romance.

The Eiffel tower is in Paris, the famed City of Love.

Illustrated covers tend to feature on romance or rom-com novels.

But …

The book was not a romance.

It was women’s fiction. it may or may not have been a good novel: I don’t remember. All I remember is reading it and waiting for the romance to start (it never did … because it wasn’t a romance novel).

So that’s one aspect of marketing that can annoy me if done wrong: the cover should match the genre.

The book title and description should also indicate the genre, and shouldn’t give any spoilers.

  • If the title is “A Wedding Disaster” I’m going to expect a wedding (with a disaster) in the first few chapters.
  • If the book description references an event that’s going to change the character’s lives, that event should happen in the first few chapters.
Most other book marketing blunders don’t bother me from a reader perspective.

As a reviewer, editor, and participant in a lot of online author groups, I often come across books that aren’t marketed well. I might offer advice, but it doesn’t necessarily bother me as a reader.

So what does bother me?

Seeing unsuspecting authors spend their money on dodgy publishing and marketing packages.

This bothers me as an advisor and as a Christian, but not as a reader. Unfortunately, the people who have spent (wasted) money on “marketing services” tend to get defensive when people suggest that time and money could have been better spent on pretty much anything else.

Dodgy services I’ve seen include:

  • Paying for your book to be uploaded to Amazon or included on Goodreads (which authors can do themselves for free)
  • Paying to activate the “Look Inside” feature on Amazon (again, something authors can do free)
  • Paying for a publisher to write and send a press release (that will go straight to spam)
  • Paying a publisher to create a “premium” book video (that will cost thousands and be less effective than an author-produced book trailer)
  • Paying a publisher thousands to create
  • Paying a “literary agency” to take their book to an overseas book fair (that will result in exactly zero sales)

This really frustrates me: “Christian” agents or publishers taking advantage of unsuspecting authors to separate them from their money in a manner that promises success but will deliver nothing the author couldn’t do themselves.

Click here to find out more about the paths to publishing, and how not to get caught by an unscrupulous vanity press.
How big is your to-read pile?

Bookish Question #260 | How big is your to-read pile?

I don’t like this question because it forces me to question why I’m buying new books or requesting review copies when I have all these unread books …

Having said that, I didn’t buy as many new books last year. I also made an effort to only buy new books if I was going to read them right away (and I mostly succeeded).

Note: that only counts for paper books and paid eBooks, not free downloads. I will still download a free eBook if it looks interesting.

But back to the question: how many books are on my to-read pile?

My paperback to-read pile is about the same size as last year.

I bought two or three paperbacks last year that I haven’t read (although one is still stuck somewhere in the global supply chain, so I haven’t received it yet).

I have 87 books in my TBR folder on my Kindle.

Those are books I bought in 2021 or earlier (and paid for). There are another 211 books in the free folder on this Kindle (and who knows how many in the Kindle cloud).

I have 18 Kindle eBooks I bought in 2022 and haven’t yet read.

Oops, that’s more than I thought. A couple look like free books, so are perhaps they’re in the wrong folder.

One is a book I bought on someone else’s recommendation, started, but haven’t finished.

Three are books I edited (so I have already read them), and I bought the eBooks to support the author. I guess that’s only 15 I have to read …

So while my to-read pile is still ginormous, it has gone down this year:

I only (only!) have 17 books I’ve bought and haven’t read, but there are 40 books I have read from last year’s to-read pile. So my pile has decreased by 23 books.

That’s a win. (Well, I’m taking it as a win.)

So I have 105 eBooks to read, and an uncounted number of paperbacks.

What about you? How big is your to-read pile?

Bookish Question #259 | Have you set a Reading Goal for 2023?

At the risk of being exceedingly boring and routine, I’m going to go for exactly the same target as last year, and the year before, and the year before that:

I aim to read 150 books

Last year, I planned to be more creative and intentional about the kinds of books I want to read:

  • Books from authors I’ve read and enjoyed before, and debut or new-to-me authors.
  • A mix of review copies, new books, and books I’ve had on my to-read pile for too long.
  • A mix of books from US and international authors.
  • More books from Black authors, indigenous authors, and authors of colour (aka BIPOC authors).
  • More nonfiction books (and not just writing craft books).

So here’s my list:

  • Read 150+ books
  • Read 48+ books from my to-read pile
  • Read 40+ books from debut or new-to-me authors
  • Read 40+ books from non-US authors
  • Read 12+ books from BIPOC authors
  • Read 18+ nonfiction books

Fortunately, some books fall under multiple categories (which I do allow, so a nonfiction book from my to-read pile that’s written by a non-US BIPOC author I haven’t read before, then the book counts under each of those categories).

Yes, that’s similar to 2022 … but that should make it achieveable.

Have you set a reading goal? If so, what is it?

(Or do you also have more than one?)

Have you achieved your 2022 Reading Goals?

Bookish Question #258 | Have you Achieved Your 2022 Reading Goal?

It’s almost the end of the year, and I haven’t quite met my 2022 reading goal. However, Christmas is over, and I’m now on my summer holiday … so it’s reading time!

(Click here to check out my 2022 reading goals.) 

I’m currently at 148 books with five days to go in the year, and it’s my summer holiday. I’m definitely going to make the 150 books as long as I don’t do something stupid like try to re-read War and Peace (or try and finish Vanity Fair).

I set an original target of 150 books, but I also set some sub-goals.

Of the 148 books I have read:

  • 15 have been by BIPOC authors (out of a target of 12+).
  • 32 were by international authors (target: 40). It’s possible I didn’t categorise some properly.
  • 44 were from debut or new-to-me authors (target: 40).
  • I intended to read 48 books from my to-read pile. I’ve read 40, which means fallen well short of the target. On the plus side, I have made a practice of reading the books I’ve bought this year, so my to-read pile has shrunk rather than grown. Win!

I had intended to read at least 24 nonfiction books, but I’ve only read 13. I guess I over-estimated that one 😉

I’ve have read 71 books by indie authors, which wasn’t something I set a specific goal around, although I do usually seek out books from indie authors.

So that’s my 2022 in books.

Did you set a reading goal for this year? How did you go?

Bookish Question #257 | What Were the Top Ten Books You Read in 2022?

Of all the books you’ve read this year, which were the most memorable for you? What are your top ten reads of 2022?

Here are mine, in the order I read them:

Click on each book title to read my review.
  1. The Girl Who Could Breathe Under Water by Erin Bartels
  2. Postcards by Elizabeth Maddrey
  3. Running Scared by Susan J Bruce
  4. Big Apple Atonement by Carolyn Miller
  5. When the Day Comes by Gabrielle Meyer
  6. Turn to Me by Becky Wade
  7. The Extraordinary Deaths of Mrs Kip by Sara Brunsvold
  8. To Win A Prince by Toni Shiloh
  9. Flight by Kristen Young
  10. Passages of Hope by Terri J Haynes

What have all these novels got in common?

I think what caught my attention is that they all a take step outside the ordinary in terms of plot or character or setting or theme. Yet they all still fit perfectly into their selected genre. Each book managed to challenge and stretch my thinking while still entertaining me, and that’s what makes a top read.

What about you? What were the top titles you read in 2022?

What's Your View on Romances Featuring Royalty?

Bookish Question #256 | What’s Your View on Romances Featuring Royalty?

This is similar to a couple of previous questions:

I have reconsidered this question, and find my opinion has changed … but only slightly.

I previously said:

I’m not a big fan of contemporary fiction (especially romance) featuring royal families.
I’m not interested in fictionalised versions of the lives of still-living people—I haven’t even watched The Crown. I’m also not interested in made-up contemporary royal families, perhaps because the lives of our real royal family have more than enough drama.

I’m from New Zealand (as you probably know), so grew up seeing Queen Elizabeth II on all the stamps, and listening to her Christmas message each year. King Charles III has succeeded his mother as our head of state, and we all watched people we knew or knew of attend the Royal Funeral or march in the funeral procession. We also had the Commonwealth Games, where the countries of the British Commonwealth compete in an Olympic-type tournament every four years (conveniently timed to be midway between the Olympics).

As such, the Royal Family were and are part of life, even if they are far removed from our everyday life.

However, I have read and enjoyed Toni Shiloh’s stories set in the imaginary African kingdom of Ọlọrọ Ilé, In Search of a Prince and To Win a Prince, and I would definitely want to read more in this vein.

I might even be interested in romances about royalty set in non-European countries, especially if the author could come up with some kind of twist. But I am still not interested in contemporary romance in European countries (particularly English-speaking countries), as that’s too close to real life.

What about you? What’s Your View on Romances Featuring Royalty?

Bookish Question #255 | What Makes the Perfect Book Boyfriend?

In other words, what makes the perfect romance hero?

My view is that a romance hero (which some bloggers call a “book boyfriend”) should exhibit the same qualities as any good man.

  • He should be a Christian (especially in Christian fiction), and should be maturing in his faith.
  • He should be kind, loving, honest, generous, hard-working … all the fruit of the spirit.
  • He should be hard-working – bonus points for having a job he is good at and enjoys.
  • And he should love the heroine and always seek to put her first.

Does he have to be attractive? No … because he’ll be attractive to the heroine even if he’s not conventionally attractive. After all, we all have different tastes (as evidence by the fact some people find Henry Cavill attractive).

Above all, the perfect romance hero isn’t perfect … because perfection is unattainable outside heaven.

But I do want to see romance heroes that set a high standard, that encourage readers to not settle for second best in a life partner when they should be seeking God’s best.

What do you think? What makes the perfect book boyfriend?